A Distinct Approach To Conversion – AB Simpson Style Jul26

Tags

Related Posts

Share This

A Distinct Approach To Conversion – AB Simpson Style

So, this past weekend I was preparing a little bit for a series of Bible studies I am going to be doing this week on reconciliation and holiness.  I am speaking to a group of camp staff at Camp IAWAH on reconciling who we are at camp with who we are at home and the pursuit of holiness.  I couldn’t ask for a more Alliance topic, could I?  As I began my research online I came across an interesting article by Canadian Theologian and Academic Gordon T. Smith.  Smith is the president of reSource Leadership International (formerly Overseas Council Canada), an agency that fosters excellence in theological education in the developing world. He also teaches part time at Regent College in Vancouver.  He is the former Dean of Canadian Theological Seminary (Regina, SK) and Alliance Biblical Seminary (Manila, Philippines).

ANYWAY, as I began to read his thinking about conversion and the need for the Alliance to develop a distinct understanding of it I was really struck by how similar it was to my own personal views.  Within the Alliance we talk a lot about the sanctification process being both a crisis moment and an ongoing process but I’ve always felt that somewhere in there conversion was also more of a process.

Our modern evangelical perspective is to presume that ‘saying a prayer’ gets you in the books and from there everything just sort of falls into place.  For some it does, no question, but as a pastor to students, many of whom are second, third and even fourth generation members of Christ-centred families, my experience and what I read in Scripture is a bit more of a progressive salvation.

Smith, in his article, talks about salvation really as containing seven distinct components.  Components because there isn’t exactly an order to them and it would probably be counter-productive to call them steps.  Anyway, he basically says that there are seven distinct components, listed below:

  1. belief, the intellectual component;
  2. repentance, the penitential component;
  3. trust, the component of emotional dependency;
  4. water baptism, the sacramental component;
  5. surrender to the will of God and consecration in response to God’s call, the volitional component;
  6. the reception of the gift of the Spirit, the charismatic component; and,
  7. incorporation into congregational life, the corporate component.

I like the way that Smith constructs this picture of conversion because in my opinion it holistically captures what I have seen in my personal experience as the foundation for a successful Christian life.  As I read through this list again, my mind immediately jumps to how we teach salvation in a church context and makes me wonder where we fall short as teachers and where we basically fail.  I mean, as I read this list I can say that sometimes in church the ‘salvation’ message is solely about belief.  ”Do you believe that Jesus was who he said he was?  Do you believe that he died for your sins, rose again and now sits at the right hand of the Father?  Will you accept his gift of salvation?”  Are we failing to provide the complete picture of salvation?

Another question pops into my head as well as it relates to spiritual formation, is our job as pastors and teachers to disciple believers or present the complete picture of salvation to people?  I mean for me, seven steps could easily be seven years of teaching in the life of my students.  I could easily start my grade 6′s out on belief, grade 7′s on repentance and so forth through all seven components, preparing them for adulthood, true conversion and a victorious Christian life.

This understanding of conversion makes a lot of sense when I look at those who have fallen away or ‘stopped the process’.  My Calvinistic side wants to believe that once I am saved I am always saved and maybe the addition of ‘if saved’ is a little more complicated than it looks.  My mind is racing so fast it’s hard to type and keep up but maybe, for my family members and friends and students who have simply ‘walked away from the church’ or started living a lifestyle that is not really in keeping with statements they’ve made is the reality of not really being ‘saved’ in the first place.  This is a really scary thought but maybe heaven won’t be as full as I hope it will be.

Maybe there is room here for a distinctive Alliance perspective on conversion.  My thinking has definitely been challenged and the practical implications of such a perspective aren’t all that complicated.  In some ways it’s almost freeing.  It gets me excited to reimagine my primary job as an evangelist, sharing the conversion message more fully.  It really gets me thinking a lot about how I view those who walk away from my programs and ministry areas and how I can better equip my students to be fully alive followers of Jesus.

I feel like I’m in an episode of Lost.  More questions at the end than answers.  There’s so much more to this than just how we understand conversion but how we understand sanctification and the reception of the gift of the Spirit as a necessary part of conversion.  Woah, not sure I can handle that right now but man, this is immense.

Well, I think I may send this post to some of my more theologically minded friends in hopes that they can contribute some wisdom and clarity to my comments, feel free to add yours too.